论文标题
一项关于用SIPM相机的17〜M类Cherenkov望远镜的性能提升的研究
A study on Performance Boost of a 17~m class Cherenkov telescope with a SiPM-based camera
论文作者
论文摘要
当前一代的成像大气Cherenkov望远镜(IACTS)由魔术望远镜等主要装置组成,H.E.S.S。 Veritas被归类为3 $^{\ MATHRM {rd}} $生成此类仪器。这些望远镜使用由数千个光电层管(PMTS)组成的多轴相机。除了PMT光子检测效率(PDE)之外,此类仪器的总光吞吐量还取决于镜像反射率以及相机窗口的光吸收。 PMTS的至高无上的光子传感器目前正受到迅速流行的光子传感器硅光电层流(SIPM)的挑战,由于其高PDE,低操作电压和安装的灵活性,它们已成为有效的替代方案。在本报告中,我们调查了现有的3 $^{\ mathrm {rd}} $ - 生成IACT阵列(以示例魔术为例)的性能,其中PMT将用SIPM替换,并以最小的进一步硬件干预替换。这意味着负责光收集的望远镜的其他系统,尤其是光学元件,将保持不变,并且只有引导不同光电探测器的电子才能被修改。我们发现,对于低于200 〜GEV的能量,灵敏度的提高至2倍。有趣的是,我们还发现,Spectrum的红色部分(IACTS背景的来源)在红色部分中的敏感性更强不会影响这一结论。
The current generation of Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes (IACTs), comprised of major installations such as the MAGIC telescopes, H.E.S.S. and VERITAS, is classified as the 3$^{\mathrm{rd}}$ generation of suchs instruments. These telescopes use multipixel cameras composed of thousands of photomultiplier tubes (PMTs). The total light throughput of such instruments depends, besides the PMT photon detection efficiency (PDE), on the mirror dish reflectivity, and the light absorption by the camera window. The supremacy of PMTs is currently being challenged by photon sensors rapidly spreading in popularity, the silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs), that are becoming a valid alternative thanks to their high PDE, low operating voltage and flexibility in installation. In this report, we investigate the performance of an existing 3$^{\mathrm{rd}}$-generation IACT array (taking as an example MAGIC) in which PMTs would be replaced with SiPMs, with minimal further hardware intervention. This would mean that other systems of the telescope responsible for the light collection, in particular the optics, would remain the same, and only the electronic to steer the different photodetectors would be modified. We find an increase of sensitivity up to a factor of 2 for energies below 200~GeV. Interestingly, we also find that the stronger sensitivity of SiPMs in the red part of the spectrum, a source of background for IACTs, does not affect this conclusion.