论文标题

哪些国际共同作者制作了更高质量的期刊文章?

Which international co-authorships produce higher quality journal articles?

论文作者

Thelwall, Mike, Kousha, Kayvan, Abdoli, Mahshid, Stuart, Emma, Makita, Meiko, Wilson, Paul, Levitt, Jonathan

论文摘要

有时会鼓励国际合作,因为它会产生更高质量的研究或更有能力解决社会问题。然而,尽管有证据表明,国际团队的期刊文章往往比平均水平更高,也许是从国​​际观众增加的,但没有科学范围内的直接学术证据表明国际合作与研究质量之间存在联系。本文首次凭经验研究了国际合作与研究质量之间的联系,其中148,977个基于英国的期刊文章具有2021年2021年研究卓越框架(REF)的出版专家评论分数。使用控制协作的序数回归模型,国际合作伙伴增加了34个评估单位(UOA)和所有主面板中27个更高质量得分的几率。因此,结果给出了第一个大规模的证据,证明了国际文章共同创作通常是有益的。在该国一级,结果表明,即使国家产生的引用影响较低,英国与其他高级研究表达经济体的合作也会产生更高的研究。令人担忧的是,可能通过误解全球南方研究目标来判断与较低的研究表达经济体的合作往往降低质量。

International collaboration is sometimes encouraged in the belief that it generates higher quality research or is more capable of addressing societal problems. Nevertheless, while there is evidence that the journal articles of international teams tend to be more cited than average, perhaps from increased international audiences, there is no science-wide direct academic evidence of a connection between international collaboration and research quality. This article empirically investigates the connection between international collaboration and research quality for the first time, with 148,977 UK-based journal articles with post publication expert review scores from the 2021 Research Excellence Framework (REF). Using an ordinal regression model controlling for collaboration, international partners increased the odds of higher quality scores in 27 out of 34 Units of Assessment (UoAs) and all Main Panels. The results therefore give the first large scale evidence of the fields in which international co-authorship for articles is usually apparently beneficial. At the country level, the results suggests that UK collaboration with other high research-expenditure economies generates higher quality research, even when the countries produce lower citation impact journal articles than the United Kingdom. Worryingly, collaborations with lower research-expenditure economies tend to be judged lower quality, possibly through misunderstanding Global South research goals.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源