论文标题
是否应该通过平等或不平等来定义纠缠的一夫一妻制？
Should monogamy of entanglement be defined via equalities or inequalities?
论文作者
论文摘要
这项工作着重于纠缠量化。具体而言，我们将介绍应通过“良好”纠缠措施来满足纠缠的属性。我们将看看多年来纠缠措施的一些主张。然后，我们将准备讨论另一种纠缠属性的数学表示的建议，即一夫一妻制。我们将介绍一些一夫一妻纠缠措施的定义，并将其比较。作为对我的原始观察（请参阅第15页，证明1），我还将证明[C. Lancien，S。DiMartino，M。Huber，M。Piani，G。Adesso和A. Winter Phys。 Rev. Lett。，117：060501（2016）。]自动表明形成的纠缠和纠缠的正则熵是一夫一妻制的纠缠措施，从[G. Gour和G. Yu，Quantum 2，81（2018）。]。
This work focuses on the entanglement quantification. Specifically, we will go over the properties of entanglement that should be satisfied by a "good" entanglement measure. We will have a look at some of the propositions of the entanglement measures that have been made over the years. Then we will be ready to discuss the proposals of the mathematical representations of another property of entanglement, called monogamy. We will introduce some definitions of monogamous entanglement measures that were proposed and compare them. As an original observation of mine (see page 15, Proof 1), I will also prove that the inequalities (23) and (24) from [C. Lancien, S. Di Martino, M. Huber, M. Piani, G. Adesso and A. Winter Phys. Rev. Lett., 117:060501 (2016).] automatically show that the entanglement of formation and the regularised entropy of entanglement are monogamous entanglement measures in the sense of the definitions that was given in [G. Gour and G. Yu, Quantum 2, 81 (2018).].
