论文标题
宇宙空隙排除模型及其对大型结构的距离尺度测量的影响
Cosmic void exclusion models and their impact on the distance scale measurements from large scale structure
论文作者
论文摘要
基于空隙和物质示踪剂的聚类的Baryonic声学振荡(BAO)研究对与宇宙扩张有关的宇宙学参数提供了重要的限制。但是,对空隙排除效应进行建模是充分利用这种分析潜力的重要挑战。因此,我们开发了两种数值方法来描述宇宙空隙的聚类。这两个模型都不需要超出银河系脱木模型中假定的其他宇宙学信息。这些模型由功率光谱组成,我们的性能与斑点立方体和轻单锥模型的抛物线模型相比,我们的性能进行了评估。此外,我们测试了它们针对系统效应和重建技术的鲁棒性。 Void模型功率谱和具有固定参数的抛物线模型为Alcock-Paczynski($α$)参数提供了强相关的值,也为盒子和光孔提供了强烈的相关值。所得的$α$值 - 对于所有三个模型 - 无偏见,其不确定性是正确估计的。但是,与抛物线寄生虫相比,数值模型的变化较小。贝叶斯证据表明,与抛物线模型相比,数值技术通常受到青睐。此外,在盒子上计算出的空隙模型功率光谱可以描述灯光和盒子中的空隙聚集。相同的空隙模型功率谱可用于研究前后的数据集。最后,这两种数值技术对所研究的系统效应具有弹性。因此,使用两个新的空隙模型中的任何一个,一个人可以更稳定地测量宇宙学参数。
Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations (BAOs) studies based on the clustering of voids and matter tracers provide important constraints on cosmological parameters related to the expansion of the Universe. However, modelling the void exclusion effect is an important challenge for fully exploiting the potential of this kind of analyses. We thus develop two numerical methods to describe the clustering of cosmic voids. Neither model requires additional cosmological information beyond that assumed within the galaxy de-wiggled model. The models consist in power spectra whose performance we assess in comparison to a parabolic model on Patchy cubic and light-cone mocks. Moreover, we test their robustness against systematic effects and the reconstruction technique. The void model power spectra and the parabolic model with a fixed parameter provide strongly correlated values for the Alcock-Paczynski ($α$) parameter, for boxes and light-cones likewise. The resulting $α$ values -- for all three models -- are unbiased and their uncertainties are correctly estimated. However, the numerical models show less variation with the fitting range compared to the parabolic one. The Bayesian evidence suggests that the numerical techniques are often favoured compared to the parabolic model. Moreover, the void model power spectra computed on boxes can describe the void clustering from light-cones as well as from boxes. The same void model power spectra can be used for the study of pre- and post-reconstructed data-sets. Lastly, the two numerical techniques are resilient against the studied systematic effects. Consequently, using either of the two new void models, one can more robustly measure cosmological parameters.