论文标题
部分可观测时空混沌系统的无模型预测
Spin-state Gaps and Self-Interaction-Corrected Density Functional Approximations: Octahedral Fe(II) Complexes as Case Study
论文作者
论文摘要
旋转状态能差的准确预测对于理解自旋跨界(SCO)现象至关重要,并且对于密度功能近似值,特别是由于局部和半局部近似值,这是非常具有挑战性的。在这里,我们研究了从Zope等人通过Zope等人使用最近开发的本地规模的自我互动校正(LSIC),研究了从局部旋转密度近似(LSDA)和PBE广义梯度近似(GGA)从局部旋转密度近似(LSDA)和PBE广义梯度近似(GGA)的影响的影响。 [J。化学物理。 151,214108(2019)]。对于单电子密度,LSIC方法是精确的,该密度恢复了基本功能的均匀电子气体极限,并接近了众所周知的Perdew-Zunger自我相互作用校正[Phys。 Rev. B,23,5048(1981)](PZSIC)是缩放因子恒定的特殊情况。与参考扩散蒙特卡洛(DMC)结果相比,我们的结果表明,PZSIC方法显着高估了旋转状态间隙,偏向于所有配体的低自旋状态,并且对DFAS并没有改善。使用PZSIC密度的扰动LSIC-LSDA显着改善了差距,平均绝对误差为0.51 eV,但对于较强的CO配体,略有过度校正。准自偏见的LSIC-LSDA(例如CCSD(T))为所有MAE的配体提供了正确的旋转状态间隙的迹象,可与CCSD(t)(0.49 eV)相当。
Accurate prediction of spin-state energy difference is crucial for understanding the spin crossover (SCO) phenomena and is very challenging for the density functional approximations, especially for the local and semi-local approximations, due to delocalization errors. Here, we investigate the effect of self-interaction error removal from the local spin density approximation (LSDA) and PBE generalized gradient approximation (GGA) on the spin-state gaps of Fe(II) complexes with various ligands using recently developed locally scaled self-interaction correction (LSIC) by Zope et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 151, 214108 (2019)]. The LSIC method is exact for one-electron density, which recovers uniform electron gas limit of underlying functional and approaches the well-known Perdew-Zunger self-interaction correction [Phys. Rev. B, 23, 5048 (1981)] (PZSIC) as a special case when the scaling factor is constant. Our results, when compared with reference diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) results, show that the PZSIC method significantly overestimates spin-state gaps favoring low spin states for all ligands and does not improve upon DFAs. The perturbative LSIC-LSDA using PZSIC densities significantly improves the gaps with a mean absolute error of 0.51 eV but slightly overcorrects for the stronger CO ligands. The quasi-self-consistent LSIC-LSDA, like CCSD(T), gives a correct sign of spin-state gaps for all ligands with MAE of 0.56 eV, comparable to that of CCSD(T) (0.49 eV).