论文标题
用詹姆斯·韦伯太空望远镜以$ z \ geq 5 $揭示星系的主要顺序:模拟预测
Unveiling the main sequence of galaxies at $z \geq 5$ with the James Webb Space Telescope: predictions from simulations
论文作者
论文摘要
We use two independent, galaxy formation simulations, FLARES, a cosmological hydrodynamical simulation, and SHARK, a semi-analytic model, to explore how well the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) will be able to uncover the existence and parameters of the star-forming main sequence (SFS) at $z=5\to10$, i.e. shape, scatter, normalisation.使用两个独立的模拟使我们能够隔离预测(例如,恒星质量,恒星形成率,SFR,光度函数),这些预测可靠或高度依赖于星系形成物理学的实现。这两个模拟都预测,JWST可以观察到$ \ ge 70-90 \%$(分别用于鲨鱼和耀斑)的星系,最高可达$ z \ sim10 $(降至$ \ $ \ of $ \ of 10^{8.3} \,\ rm m m _ {8.3} \,\ rm m _ { M _ {\ odot} \,yr^{ - 1} $在适度的集成时间和给定当前提出的调查区域(例如Web Cosmos $ 0.6 \,\ rm deg^2 $),以准确约束SFS的参数。尽管两个模拟都预测了恒星质量和SFR的定性分布,但存在重要的定量差异,例如大量的大量,形成星形的星系,耀斑预测的丰度会高于鲨鱼。由于耀斑的黑洞生长($ z \ 8 $),猝灭的早期发作,直到鲨鱼才出现,直到较低的红移。以及合成光度法的实现,耀斑预测JWST检测的星系($ \ sim 90 \%$)比鲨鱼($ \ sim 70 \%$ $)在$ z = 10 $中。 JWST的观察将区分这些模型,从而使我们对第一星系的形成的理解有了重大的改善。
We use two independent, galaxy formation simulations, FLARES, a cosmological hydrodynamical simulation, and SHARK, a semi-analytic model, to explore how well the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) will be able to uncover the existence and parameters of the star-forming main sequence (SFS) at $z=5\to10$, i.e. shape, scatter, normalisation. Using two independent simulations allows us to isolate predictions (e.g., stellar mass, star formation rate, SFR, luminosity functions) that are robust to or highly dependent on the implementation of the physics of galaxy formation. Both simulations predict that JWST can observe $\ge 70-90\%$ (for SHARK and FLARES respectively) of galaxies up to $z\sim10$ (down to stellar masses of $\approx 10^{8.3}\,\rm M_{\odot}$ and SFRs of $\approx 10^{0.5}\,\rm M_{\odot}\, yr^{-1}$) in modest integration times and given current proposed survey areas (e.g. the Web COSMOS $0.6\,\rm deg^2$) to accurately constrain the parameters of the SFS. Although both simulations predict qualitatively similar distributions of stellar mass and SFR, there are important quantitative differences, such as the abundance of massive, star-forming galaxies, with FLARES predicting a higher abundance than SHARK; the early onset of quenching as a result of black hole growth in FLARES (at $z\approx 8$), not seen in SHARK until much lower redshifts; and the implementation of synthetic photometry, with FLARES predicting more JWST-detected galaxies ($\sim 90\%$) than SHARK ($\sim 70\%$) at $z=10$. JWST observations will distinguish between these models, leading to a significant improvement upon our understanding of the formation of the very first galaxies.