论文标题
从观察到二进制黑洞的观察中推断出偏心率的演变
Inferring eccentricity evolution from observations of coalescing binary black holes
论文作者
论文摘要
恒星质量二进制黑洞的起源和形成仍然是一个空旷的问题,可以通过从其重力波信号对二元和轨道参数进行精确测量来解决。由于重力波接近合并时的发射,预计此类二进制文件会循环。然而,根据其形成通道的不同,在输入当前重力波检测器的频带时,某些二进制文件可能具有不可忽视的偏心率。为了测量观察到的重力波信号中的偏心率,需要精确的波形模型来描述偏心轨道中的二进制物。在这项工作中,我们证明了改进的Teobresums波形模型的功效,用于与旋转的偏心二进制。我们首先验证模型,以防止对齐的旋转二进制黑洞合并的模拟信号,并量化偏心率对其他固有二进制参数估计的影响。然后,我们使用偏心波形模型对GW150914进行全贝叶斯重新分析。我们发现(i)该模型对于对齐的旋转二进制黑洞是可靠的,并且(ii)GW150914与非注重合并一致,尽管我们不能以$ 20 $ Hz的参考频率排除初始偏心率的小值。最后,我们提出了一种直接从重力波后样品中测量偏心率及其进化的系统方法。当比较不同分析的结果时,这种估计器很有用,因为模型之间的偏心率可能有所不同。即使在少量偏心率的情况下,也可以采用我们的方案,并且可以直接采用后处理以允许模型之间的直接比较。
The origin and formation of stellar-mass binary black holes remains an open question that can be addressed by precise measurements of the binary and orbital parameters from their gravitational-wave signal. Such binaries are expected to circularize due to the emission of gravitational waves as they approach merger. However, depending on their formation channel, some binaries could have a non-negligible eccentricity when entering the frequency band of current gravitational-wave detectors. In order to measure eccentricity in an observed gravitational-wave signal, accurate waveform models that describe binaries in eccentric orbits are necessary. In this work we demonstrate the efficacy of the improved TEOBResumS waveform model for eccentric coalescing binaries with aligned spins. We first validate the model against mock signals of aligned-spin binary black hole mergers and quantify the impact of eccentricity on the estimation of other intrinsic binary parameters. We then perform a fully Bayesian reanalysis of GW150914 with the eccentric waveform model. We find (i) that the model is reliable for aligned-spin binary black holes and (ii) that GW150914 is consistent with a non-eccentric merger although we cannot rule out small values of initial eccentricity at a reference frequency of $20$ Hz. Finally, we present a systematic method to measure the eccentricity and its evolution directly from the gravitational-wave posterior samples. Such an estimator is useful when comparing results from different analyses as the definition of eccentricity may differ between models. Our scheme can be applied even in the case of small eccentricities and can be adopted straightforwardly in post-processing to allow for direct comparison between models.