论文标题
关于社区节奏的报告,观察到最大化凯克星球查找器的科学输出
Report on Community Cadence Observing to Maximize the Scientific Output of the Keck Planet Finder
论文作者
论文摘要
2022年凯克行星发现者(KPF)的到来代表了W. M. Keck天文台的精确径向速度(PRV)能力的重大进步。为了准备KPF科学,我们的PRV专家委员会和WMKO委员会研究了当前在Keck和其他PRV设施观察的Cadence的实施。我们发现,通过凯克(Keck)对单个PI的完整或半夜的标准分配,KPF的许多主要科学案例是不可行的。与当前与雇员合作相比,在较高的观察性节奏时可用时,与雇用的加利福尼亚星球搜索(CPS)合作相比,在几个PI中汇总时间的质量质量较低。该策略还为进入障碍造成了障碍,特别是对于希望领导小型建议的研究人员。 该报告提出了以下限制的建议,以优化凯克的PRV节奏:在节奏观察和经典计划的时间之间保存明确的界限;并确保不同的Keck TAC和不同KPF PI的公平和科学独立性。我们建议建立一个新类别的Keck时间分配“ KPF社区Cadence”(KPF-CC)。在许多方面,KPF-CC将形式化CPS提供的观察策略,但具有更高的观察性节奏适合KPF科学,并为所有KECK用户提供了普遍访问该计划的机会。我们建议将KPF-CC的时间经典地安排在一个小至季度之夜的块中,但要考虑明亮/黑暗的时间,提案压力的变化以及季节的变化以及非KPF观察计划的需求。在KPF-CC时间内,凯克观察助手将执行动态调度程序产生的观察值。我们建议KECK员工和PRV专家董事会设计并维护调度软件。
The arrival of the Keck Planet Finder (KPF) in 2022 represents a major advance in the precision radial velocity (PRV) capabilities of the W. M. Keck Observatory. In preparation for KPF science, our committee of PRV experts and WMKO staff studied the current implementation of cadence observing at Keck and other PRV facilities. We find that many of KPF's major science cases are not feasible through Keck's standard allocations of full or half nights to individual PIs. Pooling time among several PIs as is currently done by the California Planet Search (CPS) collaboration with HIRES results in lower quality science results than is possible when KPF is available at higher observational cadence. This strategy also creates barriers to entry, particularly for researchers wishing to lead small proposals. This report makes recommendations for optimizing PRV cadence at Keck subject to the following constraints: preservation of clear boundaries between cadence observations and classically scheduled time; and ensuring fairness and scientific independence of different Keck TACs and different KPF PIs. We recommend establishing a new category of Keck time allocation, "KPF Community Cadence" (KPF-CC). In many ways, KPF-CC will formalize observing strategies provided by CPS, but with higher observational cadence appropriate for KPF science and with universal access to the program for all Keck users. We recommend that KPF-CC time be scheduled classically into blocks as small as a quarter night subject to considerations of bright/dark time, variations in proposal pressure with the seasons, and the needs of non-KPF observing programs. Within KPF-CC time, the Keck Observing Assistants would execute observations generated by a dynamic scheduler. We recommend that Keck staff and a board of PRV experts design and maintain the scheduling software.