论文标题
降低高峰需求的电网关税：是否存在与电点价格的价格信号冲突？
Grid Tariffs for Peak Demand Reduction: Is there a Price Signal Conflict with Electricity Spot Prices?
论文作者
论文摘要
由于逐碳化趋势，预计电网将需要大量投资，呼吁改变电网关税设计，这为减少峰值负载提供了适当的激励措施。但是，电网关税的价格信号可能会因电价而扭曲，这也代表了消费者总账单的重要性。本文试图确定网格关税和现货价格之间是否存在价格信号冲突。比较了四个不同的网格关税设计，使用通用需求响应模型作为成本最小化线性程序的一部分，以模拟峰值负载的减少。该方法应用于挪威奥斯陆3608个消费者的计量电力需求。结果表明，新的网格关税设计将峰值负载降低了1-4％，当消费者受到电力现货价格时，峰值负载的降低较小。
The electricity grid is expected to require vast investments due to the decarbonization-by-electrification trend, calling for a change in grid tariff design which provides proper incentives for reducing peak loads. However, price signals from grid tariffs could be distorted from electricity spot prices which also represents a significant of the total consumer electricity bill. This paper attempts to identify whether there is a price signal conflict between grid tariffs and spot prices. Four different grid tariff designs are compared, using a generic demand response model as part of a cost-minimizing linear program to simulate the reduction in peak load. The method is applied to metered electricity demand from 3608 consumers in Oslo, Norway. Results show that new grid tariff designs reduce peak loads by 1-4%, and that reduction in peak load is smaller when consumers are subject to electricity spot prices.
