论文标题

在存在强宽噪声的情况下确定QPO性能:关于Maxi J1820+070数据的案例研究

Determination of QPO properties in the presence of strong broad-band noise: a case study on the data of MAXI J1820+070

论文作者

Zhou, Deng-Ke, Zhang, Shuang-Nan, Song, Li-Ming, Qu, Jin-Lu, Zhang, Liang, Ma, Xiang, Tuo, You-Li, Ge, Ming-Yu, Wang, Yanan, Zhang, Shu, Tao, Lian

论文摘要

准确计算准周期振荡(QPO)的相位滞后将提供对其起源的见解。在本文中,我们研究了已应用的相位滞后校正方法,该方法用于计算Maxi J1820+070中QPO的固有相位滞后。我们发现,在时间域中,BBN和QPO之间的传统添加剂模型被拒绝,但是接受了卷积模型。通过在时域引入卷积机制,傅立叶跨光谱分析表明,不同能带中QPOS组分之间的相位滞后将与总信号之间的相位滞后具有简单的线性关系,因此可以通过线性校正获得QPOS的固有相位滞后。因此,功率密度光谱(PDS)需要一个乘法模型来解释数据。我们简要讨论解释卷积的物理场景。在这种情况下,电晕充当低通滤波器,包含噪声的绿色功能与QPO相连以形成PDS的低频部分,而高频零件则需要加成分量。我们使用乘法PDS模型来拟合Insight-HXMT观察到的数据。与传统的添加剂PDS模型相比,总体拟合结果相似。除R.M.S.以外,从两个PDS模型中获得的QPO的宽度和质心频率都没有显着差异。 QPO。因此,我们的工作为噪声和QPO的耦合提供了新的视角。

Accurate calculation of the phase lags of quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) will provide insight into their origin. In this paper we investigate the phase lag correction method which has been applied to calculate the intrinsic phase lags of the QPOs in MAXI J1820+070. We find that the traditional additive model between BBN and QPOs in the time domain is rejected, but the convolution model is accepted. By introducing a convolution mechanism in the time domain, the Fourier cross-spectrum analysis shows that the phase lags between QPOs components in different energy bands will have a simple linear relationship with the phase lags between the total signals, so that the intrinsic phase lags of the QPOs can be obtained by linear correction. The power density spectrum (PDS) thus requires a multiplicative model to interpret the data. We briefly discuss a physical scenario for interpreting the convolution. In this scenario, the corona acts as a low-pass filter, the Green's function containing the noise is convolved with the QPOs to form the low-frequency part of the PDS, while the high-frequency part requires an additive component. We use a multiplicative PDS model to fit the data observed by Insight-HXMT. The overall fitting results are similar compared to the traditional additive PDS model. Neither the width nor the centroid frequency of the QPOs obtained from each of the two PDS models were significantly different, except for the r.m.s. of the QPOs. Our work thus provides a new perspective on the coupling of noise and QPOs.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源