论文标题

基于AI的视神经头鲁棒性取代生物力学测试的临床评估

AI-based Clinical Assessment of Optic Nerve Head Robustness Superseding Biomechanical Testing

论文作者

Braeu, Fabian A., Chuangsuwanich, Thanadet, Tun, Tin A., Thiery, Alexandre H., Aung, Tin, Barbastathis, George, Girard, Michaël J. A.

论文摘要

$ \ mathbf {perim} $:将人工智能(AI)使用:(1)从相对较大的人群中利用视神经头(ONH)的生物力学知识; (2)评估ONH的单个光学相干断层扫描(OCT)扫描的鲁棒性; (3)确定哪些关键的三维(3D)结构特征使给定的ONH稳健。 $ \ Mathbf {Design} $:回顾性横断面研究。 $ \ mathbf {方法} $:316个受试者通过Ophthalmo-Dynamometry在急性眼内和之后的OCT成像。然后将IOP诱导的椎板和胶状变形映射为3D,并用于对ONH进行分类。 LC变形高于4%的人被认为是脆弱的,而变形较低的人则较低4%。从这些数据中学习,我们比较了三种AI算法,以严格地从基线(未变形)OCT卷中预测鲁棒性:(1)随机森林分类器; (2)自动编码器; (3)动态图CNN(DGCNN)。后一种算法也使我们能够确定哪些关键的3D结构特征使给定的ONH稳健。 $ \ mathbf {结果} $:所有3种方法都能单独预测3D结构信息的鲁棒性,而无需执行生物力学测试。 DGCNN(接收器操作曲线下的区域[AUC]:0.76 $ \ pm $ 0.08)的表现优于自动编码器(AUC:0.70 $ \ pm $ 0.07)和随机森林分类器(AUC:0.69 $ \ pm $ 0.05)。有趣的是,为了评估稳健性,DGCNN主要使用了巩膜和LC插入位点的信息。 $ \ mathbf {结论} $:我们提出了一种AI驱动的方法,可以仅从ONH的单个OCT扫描中评估给定ONH的稳健性,而无需进行生物力学测试。纵向研究应确定ONH鲁棒性是否可以帮助我们确定快速的视野损失进展者。

$\mathbf{Purpose}$: To use artificial intelligence (AI) to: (1) exploit biomechanical knowledge of the optic nerve head (ONH) from a relatively large population; (2) assess ONH robustness from a single optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan of the ONH; (3) identify what critical three-dimensional (3D) structural features make a given ONH robust. $\mathbf{Design}$: Retrospective cross-sectional study. $\mathbf{Methods}$: 316 subjects had their ONHs imaged with OCT before and after acute intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation through ophthalmo-dynamometry. IOP-induced lamina-cribrosa deformations were then mapped in 3D and used to classify ONHs. Those with LC deformations superior to 4% were considered fragile, while those with deformations inferior to 4% robust. Learning from these data, we compared three AI algorithms to predict ONH robustness strictly from a baseline (undeformed) OCT volume: (1) a random forest classifier; (2) an autoencoder; and (3) a dynamic graph CNN (DGCNN). The latter algorithm also allowed us to identify what critical 3D structural features make a given ONH robust. $\mathbf{Results}$: All 3 methods were able to predict ONH robustness from 3D structural information alone and without the need to perform biomechanical testing. The DGCNN (area under the receiver operating curve [AUC]: 0.76 $\pm$ 0.08) outperformed the autoencoder (AUC: 0.70 $\pm$ 0.07) and the random forest classifier (AUC: 0.69 $\pm$ 0.05). Interestingly, to assess ONH robustness, the DGCNN mainly used information from the scleral canal and the LC insertion sites. $\mathbf{Conclusions}$: We propose an AI-driven approach that can assess the robustness of a given ONH solely from a single OCT scan of the ONH, and without the need to perform biomechanical testing. Longitudinal studies should establish whether ONH robustness could help us identify fast visual field loss progressors.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源