论文标题
基于AI的视神经头鲁棒性取代生物力学测试的临床评估
AI-based Clinical Assessment of Optic Nerve Head Robustness Superseding Biomechanical Testing
论文作者
论文摘要
$ \ mathbf {perim} $:将人工智能(AI)使用:(1)从相对较大的人群中利用视神经头(ONH)的生物力学知识; (2)评估ONH的单个光学相干断层扫描(OCT)扫描的鲁棒性; (3)确定哪些关键的三维(3D)结构特征使给定的ONH稳健。 $ \ Mathbf {Design} $:回顾性横断面研究。 $ \ mathbf {方法} $:316个受试者通过Ophthalmo-Dynamometry在急性眼内和之后的OCT成像。然后将IOP诱导的椎板和胶状变形映射为3D,并用于对ONH进行分类。 LC变形高于4%的人被认为是脆弱的,而变形较低的人则较低4%。从这些数据中学习,我们比较了三种AI算法,以严格地从基线(未变形)OCT卷中预测鲁棒性:(1)随机森林分类器; (2)自动编码器; (3)动态图CNN(DGCNN)。后一种算法也使我们能够确定哪些关键的3D结构特征使给定的ONH稳健。 $ \ mathbf {结果} $:所有3种方法都能单独预测3D结构信息的鲁棒性,而无需执行生物力学测试。 DGCNN(接收器操作曲线下的区域[AUC]:0.76 $ \ pm $ 0.08)的表现优于自动编码器(AUC:0.70 $ \ pm $ 0.07)和随机森林分类器(AUC:0.69 $ \ pm $ 0.05)。有趣的是,为了评估稳健性,DGCNN主要使用了巩膜和LC插入位点的信息。 $ \ mathbf {结论} $:我们提出了一种AI驱动的方法,可以仅从ONH的单个OCT扫描中评估给定ONH的稳健性,而无需进行生物力学测试。纵向研究应确定ONH鲁棒性是否可以帮助我们确定快速的视野损失进展者。
$\mathbf{Purpose}$: To use artificial intelligence (AI) to: (1) exploit biomechanical knowledge of the optic nerve head (ONH) from a relatively large population; (2) assess ONH robustness from a single optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan of the ONH; (3) identify what critical three-dimensional (3D) structural features make a given ONH robust. $\mathbf{Design}$: Retrospective cross-sectional study. $\mathbf{Methods}$: 316 subjects had their ONHs imaged with OCT before and after acute intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation through ophthalmo-dynamometry. IOP-induced lamina-cribrosa deformations were then mapped in 3D and used to classify ONHs. Those with LC deformations superior to 4% were considered fragile, while those with deformations inferior to 4% robust. Learning from these data, we compared three AI algorithms to predict ONH robustness strictly from a baseline (undeformed) OCT volume: (1) a random forest classifier; (2) an autoencoder; and (3) a dynamic graph CNN (DGCNN). The latter algorithm also allowed us to identify what critical 3D structural features make a given ONH robust. $\mathbf{Results}$: All 3 methods were able to predict ONH robustness from 3D structural information alone and without the need to perform biomechanical testing. The DGCNN (area under the receiver operating curve [AUC]: 0.76 $\pm$ 0.08) outperformed the autoencoder (AUC: 0.70 $\pm$ 0.07) and the random forest classifier (AUC: 0.69 $\pm$ 0.05). Interestingly, to assess ONH robustness, the DGCNN mainly used information from the scleral canal and the LC insertion sites. $\mathbf{Conclusions}$: We propose an AI-driven approach that can assess the robustness of a given ONH solely from a single OCT scan of the ONH, and without the need to perform biomechanical testing. Longitudinal studies should establish whether ONH robustness could help us identify fast visual field loss progressors.