论文标题
基于文本的自动人格预测使用Kgrat-net;知识图注意网络分类器
Text-Based Automatic Personality Prediction Using KGrAt-Net; A Knowledge Graph Attention Network Classifier
论文作者
论文摘要
如今,在基于互联网的沟通基础架构(例如社交网络,电子邮件,论坛,组织沟通平台等)上发生了大量的人类沟通。的确,通过书面或交换的文本对个人个性的自动预测或评估将是有利的。为此,本文旨在提出Kgrat-NET,这是一个知识图注意网络文本分类器。根据五大人格特征,它首次应用知识图注意网络来执行自动人格预测(APP)。在执行了一些预处理活动之后,它首先试图通过构建其等效知识图来获取输入文本中概念背后的知识的了解。知识图以机器可读形式收集概念,实体和关系的相互联系的描述。实际上,它为它们之间的概念及其语义关系提供了机器可读的认知理解。然后,应用注意机制,它试图注意图表中最相关的部分,以预测输入文本的人格特征。我们使用了论文数据集中的2,467篇论文。结果表明,KGRAT网络的人格预测精度有了显着改善(平均高达70.26%)。此外,Kgrat-net还使用知识图嵌入来丰富分类,这使其在应用程序中更加准确(平均为72.41%)。
Nowadays, a tremendous amount of human communications occur on Internet-based communication infrastructures, like social networks, email, forums, organizational communication platforms, etc. Indeed, the automatic prediction or assessment of individuals' personalities through their written or exchanged text would be advantageous to ameliorate their relationships. To this end, this paper aims to propose KGrAt-Net, which is a Knowledge Graph Attention Network text classifier. For the first time, it applies the knowledge graph attention network to perform Automatic Personality Prediction (APP), according to the Big Five personality traits. After performing some preprocessing activities, it first tries to acquire a knowing-full representation of the knowledge behind the concepts in the input text by building its equivalent knowledge graph. A knowledge graph collects interlinked descriptions of concepts, entities, and relationships in a machine-readable form. Practically, it provides a machine-readable cognitive understanding of concepts and semantic relationships among them. Then, applying the attention mechanism, it attempts to pay attention to the most relevant parts of the graph to predict the personality traits of the input text. We used 2,467 essays from the Essays Dataset. The results demonstrated that KGrAt-Net considerably improved personality prediction accuracies (up to 70.26% on average). Furthermore, KGrAt-Net also uses knowledge graph embedding to enrich the classification, which makes it even more accurate (on average, 72.41%) in APP.