论文标题

在精选环境中的社会包容性:博物馆实践的见解

Social Inclusion in Curated Contexts: Insights from Museum Practices

论文作者

Huang, Han-Yin, Liem, Cynthia C. S.

论文摘要

人工智能文献表明,由于设计过程中的固有偏见,机器学习算法会对社会中的少数群体和脆弱的社区产生负面影响,这导致了社会独家的决策和政策。面对与日益多样化的受众打交道的类似挑战,博物馆部门已经看到了理论和实践的变化,尤其是在代表和意义的领域。尽管稀有和宏伟曾经是早期博物馆实践的中心阶段,民间生活和博物馆与他们所服务的多元化社区的关系成为当代实践的广泛融合的一部分。这些更改涉及多样性和可访问性的问题,以提供更多社会包容的服务。利用这些变化并反思AI世界,我们认为博物馆的体验为通过社会包容性的方法构建AI提供了有用的课程,尤其是在搜索引擎,推荐系统和数字图书馆中经常发生的藏品和访问权限的情况下,需要进行策划或过滤。我们重点介绍了三个原则:(1)而不是维护中立的价值,而是意识到自己背景的影响以及他人的工作的影响。通过没有声称是中立的,但要实践文化谦卑,可以增加解决潜在偏见的机会。 (2)除了数据收集和机器学习阶段之外,应该有局势解释的空间。在应用模型和预测之前,应考虑到相关各方的上下文。 (3)社区参与满足了社区的需求,并带来了将从业者和社区聚集在一起的额外好处。

Artificial intelligence literature suggests that minority and fragile communities in society can be negatively impacted by machine learning algorithms due to inherent biases in the design process, which lead to socially exclusive decisions and policies. Faced with similar challenges in dealing with an increasingly diversified audience, the museum sector has seen changes in theory and practice, particularly in the areas of representation and meaning-making. While rarity and grandeur used to be at the centre stage of the early museum practices, folk life and museums' relationships with the diverse communities they serve become a widely integrated part of the contemporary practices. These changes address issues of diversity and accessibility in order to offer more socially inclusive services. Drawing on these changes and reflecting back on the AI world, we argue that the museum experience provides useful lessons for building AI with socially inclusive approaches, especially in situations in which both a collection and access to it will need to be curated or filtered, as frequently happens in search engines, recommender systems and digital libraries. We highlight three principles: (1) Instead of upholding the value of neutrality, practitioners are aware of the influences of their own backgrounds and those of others on their work. By not claiming to be neutral but practising cultural humility, the chances of addressing potential biases can be increased. (2) There should be room for situational interpretation beyond the stages of data collection and machine learning. Before applying models and predictions, the contexts in which relevant parties exist should be taken into account. (3) Community participation serves the needs of communities and has the added benefit of bringing practitioners and communities together.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源