论文标题
车辆噪声:比较现场和实验室的响度等级
Vehicle Noise: Comparison of Loudness Ratings in the Field and the Laboratory
论文作者
论文摘要
目的:失真的响度感知是助听器用户的主要抱怨之一。能够在诊所正确衡量响度的感知对于安装助听器至关重要。为此,诊所中的实验应该能够像日常生活中一样反映和捕捉响度。比较了该领域和实验室中的响度感知的研究很少。设计:参与者对野外和实验室的响度进行了评估,该实验室由四辆不同的车辆进行了36次驾驶动作。现场测量是在受限的街道上进行的,并用360度相机和四面体麦克风记录下来。公开访问的录制刺激在实验室中以三种不同的条件显示:360DEG视频录制,带有头部已安装的显示器,带桌面显示器的视频录制以及仅录音。样本:13名正常听觉参与者和18名听力受损参与者参加了这项研究。结果:实验室的驾驶动作的评价明显大于仅在音频条件下的现场。在两个实验室条件下,这些响度评级差异的差异更大,即,在实验室中,驾驶动作的声音水平越高,驾驶动作水平就越大。三个实验室条件和组之间的响度评级没有显着差异。结论:该实验的结果进一步指出,在测量诊所的响度时,增加现实主义和沉浸的重要性。
Objective: Distorted loudness perception is one of the main complaints of hearing aid users. Being able to measure loudness perception correctly in the clinic is essential for fitting hearing aids. For this, experiments in the clinic should be able to reflect and capture loudness perception as in everyday-life situations. Little research has been done comparing loudness perception in the field and in the laboratory. Design: Participants rated the loudness in the field and in the laboratory of 36 driving actions done by four different vehicles. The field measurements were done in a restricted street and recorded with a 360deg camera and a tetrahedral microphone. The recorded stimuli, which are openly accessible, were presented in three different conditions in the laboratory: 360deg video recordings with a head-mounted display, video recordings with a desktop monitor, and audio-only. Sample: Thirteen normal-hearing participants and 18 hearing-impaired participants participated in the study. Results: The driving actions were rated significantly louder in the laboratory than in the field for the audio-only condition. These loudness rating differences were bigger for louder sounds in two laboratory conditions, i.e., the higher the sound level of a driving action was the more likely it was to be rated louder in the laboratory. There were no significant differences in the loudness ratings between the three laboratory conditions and between groups. Conclusions: The results of this experiment further remark the importance of increasing the realism and immersion when measuring loudness in the clinic.