论文标题
部分可观测时空混沌系统的无模型预测
NuSTAR Observations of 52 Compton-thick Active Galactic Nuclei Selected by the Swift/BAT All-sky Hard X-Ray Survey
论文作者
论文摘要
储层计算是预测湍流的有力工具,其简单的架构具有处理大型系统的计算效率。然而,其实现通常需要完整的状态向量测量和系统非线性知识。我们使用非线性投影函数将系统测量扩展到高维空间,然后将其输入到储层中以获得预测。我们展示了这种储层计算网络在时空混沌系统上的应用,该系统模拟了湍流的若干特征。我们表明,使用径向基函数作为非线性投影器,即使只有部分观测并且不知道控制方程,也能稳健地捕捉复杂的系统非线性。最后,我们表明,当测量稀疏、不完整且带有噪声,甚至控制方程变得不准确时,我们的网络仍然可以产生相当准确的预测,从而为实际湍流系统的无模型预测铺平了道路。
We present the systematic broadband X-ray spectral analysis of 52 Compton-thick ($24 \leq \log N_{\mathrm{H}}^{\mathrm{LOS}}/\mathrm{cm}^{-2}$) active galactic nucleus (CTAGN) candidates selected by the Swift/BAT all-sky hard X-ray survey observed with Chandra, XMM--Newton, Swift/XRT, Suzaku, and NuSTAR. The XMM--Newton data of 10 objects and the NuSTAR data of 15 objects are published for the first time. We use an X-ray spectral model from a clumpy torus (XClumpy) to determine the torus properties. As a result, the hydrogen column density along the line of sight $N_{\mathrm{H}}^{\mathrm{LOS}}$ obtained from the XClumpy model indicate that 24 objects are Compton-thin AGNs and 28 objects are Compton-thick AGNs in the 90\% confidence interval. The main reason is the difference in the torus model applied. The hydrogen column density along the equatorial direction $N_{\mathrm{H}}^{\mathrm{Equ}}$ of CTAGNs inferred from the XClumpy model is larger than that of less obscured AGNs. The Compton-thin torus covering factor $C_{22}$ obtained from the XClumpy model is consistent with that of Ricci et al. (2017) in the low Eddington ratio ($\log R_{\mathrm{Edd}} \leq -1.0$), whereas $C_{22}$ inferred from the XClumpy model is larger than that of Ricci et al. (2017) in the high Eddington ratio ($-1.0 \leq \log R_{\mathrm{Edd}}$). The average value of the Compton-thick torus covering factor $C_{24}$ obtained from the XClumpy model is $36_{-4}^{+4}$\%. This value is larger than that of Ricci et al. (2015) ($C_{24} \simeq 27_{-4}^{+4}$\%) based on the assumption that all AGNs have intrinsically the same torus structure. These results suggest that the structure of CTAGN may be intrinsically different from that of less obscured AGN.