论文标题
用成像X射线极化探索器测试BL LAC射流的粒子加速模型
Testing particle acceleration models for BL LAC jets with the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer
论文作者
论文摘要
为了确定最近启动的成像X射线极化探索器(IXPE)是否可以遵循Blazars喷气机中不同粒子加速机制引起的极化变化,我们根据极化程度和角度的高度同步峰(HSP)在极化程度和角度模拟了高度同步器峰值(HSP)的观察结果,该观察是根据Tavecchio等人的2020(2020)(2020)(2020)的理论。 (磁重新连接模型)和Marscher \&Jorstad,2021(湍流极端多区模型)。我们使用Monte Carlo工具IXPEOBSSIM创建现实的IXPE数据产品。我们通过将模拟数据分为任意的短时垃圾箱来创建极化度和角度的模拟曲线。我们使用$χ^2 $测试来评估观测值在检测极化属性的时间变化时的性能。一系列10 ks的长观测允许IXPE遵循冲击加速度模型的极化度的时间变化。在磁重新连接模型的情况下,名义注射模型根据测试的磁通水平,为5-10 KS的时间箱提供了模拟IXPE数据的最佳拟合。对于TEMZ模型,需要较短的时间切片为0.5 ks,以便使用注射模型获得模拟IXPE数据的正式拟合。另一方面,我们发现与恒定型号的拟合度分别为20 ks,60/70 ks和5 ks的时间切片分别用于冲击加速度,磁重新连接和TEMZ模型时,与名义注射模型的拟合相比,$χ^2 $低。我们得出的结论是,前提是观察的统计数据允许在足够短的时间箱中切片,请在典型的通量水平上对HSP Blazar的IXPE观察可以检测到流行的粒子加速器在喷气机中预测的时间变异性。
To determine if the recently launched Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE) can follow the polarization variations induced by different particle acceleration mechanisms in blazars jets we simulate observations of a high synchrotron peak (HSP) blazar variable in polarization degree and angle according to the theoretical predictions of Tavecchio et al., 2020 (shock acceleration model), Bodo et al., 2021 (magnetic reconnection model) and Marscher \& Jorstad, 2021 (Turbulent Extreme Multi-Zone Model). We use the Monte Carlo tool ixpeobssim to create realistic IXPE data products. We create simulated light-curves of polarization degree and angle by time-slicing the simulated data into arbitrary short time bins. We use a $χ^2$ test to assess the performance of the observations in detecting the time variability of the polarization properties. A series of 10 ks long observations permits IXPE to follow the time variability of the polarization degree in the case of the shock acceleration model. In the case of the magnetic reconnection model, the nominal injected model provides the best fit of the simulated IXPE data for time bins of 5-10 ks, depending on the tested flux level. For the TEMZ model, shorter time slices of 0.5 ks are needed for obtaining a formally good fit of the simulated IXPE data with the injected model. On the other hand, we find that a fit with a constant model provides a $χ^2$ lower than the fit with the nominal injected model when using time slices of 20 ks, 60/70 ks, and 5 ks for the case of the shock acceleration, magnetic reconnection and TEMZ model, respectively. We conclude that, provided that the statistics of the observation allows slicing of the data in adequately short time bins, IXPE observations of an HSP blazar at a typical flux level can detect the time variability predicted by popular models for particle acceleration in jets.