论文标题
评论“ Si中的角度：将Radian视为一个独立的，未承认的单元不需要重新定义“频率”或单位Hertz'
Comment on 'Angles in the SI: treating the radian as an independent, unhidden unit does not require the redefinition of the term "frequency" or the unit hertz'
论文作者
论文摘要
在P. Quincey（2020）[1]的论文中，作者声称角度不是无量纲的数量，Radian应该是一个新的独立基本单位。但是，不支持该主张，建议的重新定义将不仅在物理学中，而且在数学上会引起几个问题。提议的“无radian”将带来没有详细讨论的隐藏问题。这包括例如时间的介绍不同类型的时间和相应的单元定义为每个雷达的第二个单位。
In the paper by P. Quincey (2020) [1], the author claims that angles are not dimensionless quantities and that the radian should be a new independent base unit. However, the claim is not supported and the proposed redefinition will cause several problems not only in physics, but also in mathematics. The proposed "unhiding" of the radian will bring hidden problems not discussed in detail. This includes e.g. an introduction of quantities of different kind for time and the corresponding units defined as the second per radian.
