论文标题
网络安全研究伦理评估的知识基础实用性
Knowledge-Base Practicality for Cybersecurity Research Ethics Evaluation
论文作者
论文摘要
近年来，信息和通信技术方面的研究伦理在受欢迎程度上恢复了。尽管已经发布了许多一般道德标准，但专门尚未看到网络安全。此外，这种标准通常是抽象的，缺乏有关特定实践的指导。在本文中，我们比较了谴责研究论文的同行评审的道德分析，以分析从具体的网络安全研究伦理最佳实践的知识库（KB）中得出的分析。我们采用的KB是根据对研究论文进行的大量随机调查进行了汇编的。我们证明了初步证据表明，这种KB可用于对已发表的网络安全研究进行可比或更广泛的道德分析，而不是像Menlo报告这样的标准的专家应用。我们扩展了审查手稿的道德分析，并计算了专家与KB方法产生道德见解的效率的测量。
Research ethics in Information and Communications Technology has seen a resurgence in popularity in recent years. Although a number of general ethics standards have been issued, cyber security specifically has yet to see one. Furthermore, such standards are often abstract, lacking in guidance on specific practices. In this paper we compare peer-reviewed ethical analyses of condemned research papers to analyses derived from a knowledge base (KB) of concrete cyber security research ethics best practices. The KB we employ was compiled in prior work from a large random survey of research papers. We demonstrate preliminary evidence that such a KB can be used to yield comparable or more extensive ethical analyses of published cyber security research than expert application of standards like the Menlo Report. We extend the ethical analyses of the reviewed manuscripts, and calculate measures of the efficiency with which the expert versus KB methods yield ethical insights.
