论文标题

Terahertz Water Masers:II。进一步的索非亚/大探测到情节流出,并进行多叙事分析

Terahertz Water Masers: II. Further SOFIA/GREAT Detections toward Circumstellar Outflows, and a Multitransition Analysis

论文作者

Neufeld, David A., Menten, Karl M., Durán, Carlos, Güsten, Rolf, Kaufman, Michael J., Kraus, Alex, Mazumdar, Parichay, Melnick, Gary J., Ortiz-León, Gisela, Wiesemeyer, Helmut, Wyrowski, Friedrich

论文摘要

在2017年报道的《 Terahertz Water Masers》的发现之后,我们报告了两个以上频率以上1 THz的水层排放的进一步检测。使用Sofia上的优质乐器,我们发现了1.296411 THz $ 8_ {27} -7_ {34} $将水过渡到两个额外的氧气富含氧气的星星,Omicron CETI(Mira)和R Crateris,并获得了1.296 THZ THZ LINE ORISSISS IYORIS的上限。朝向这三个来源,以及先前报道了1.296 THZ线发射的红色超级恒星Vy Canis Majorae,我们还使用Apex 12-m望远镜以及使用Effelsberg 100-m望远镜的22 GHz过渡,观察到了几种低频(子)毫米水摩泽晶跃迁。我们已经使用了一个简单的模型来分析从中获得的多转变数据。作为先前的独立文献估计了这四个来源的质量损失率,在W hydrae中,我们推断出水丰度非常狭窄的范围:$ n({\ rm H_2O})/n({\ rm H_2})= 1.4-2.5 \ 2.5 \ 2.5 \ times 10^{ - 4} $。对于O CET,VY CMA和W HYA,该模型成功地预测了Maser Line Fluxes在典型的因子$ \ sim 1.6-3 $之内。对于R CRT和U ORI,模型不太成功,典型的线通量预测在观测值以上或之下的数量级。鉴于Maser放大的指数性质,这种差异可能并不令人惊讶。

Following up on our discovery of terahertz water masers, reported in 2017, we report two further detections of water maser emission at frequencies above 1 THz. Using the GREAT instrument on SOFIA, we have detected emission in the 1.296411 THz $8_{27}-7_{34}$ transition of water toward two additional oxygen-rich evolved stars, omicron Ceti (Mira) and R Crateris, and obtained an upper limit on the 1.296 THz line emission from U Orionis. Toward these three sources, and toward the red supergiant star VY Canis Majorae from which 1.296 THz line emission was reported previously, we have also observed several lower-frequency (sub)millimeter water maser transitions using the APEX 12-m telescope along with the 22 GHz transition using the Effelsberg 100-m telescope. We have used a simple model to analyse the multi-transition data thereby obtained. Adopting, as a prior, independent literature estimates of the mass-loss-rates in these four sources and in W Hydrae, we infer water abundances in a remarkably narrow range: $n({\rm H_2O})/n({\rm H_2}) = 1.4 - 2.5 \times 10^{-4}$. For o Cet, VY CMa, and W Hya, the model is successful in predicting the maser line fluxes to within a typical factor $\sim 1.6 - 3$. For R Crt and U Ori, the model is less successful, with typical line flux predictions lying an order of magnitude above or below the observations; such discrepancies are perhaps unsurprising given the exponential nature of maser amplification.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源