论文标题
互动的顺序决策基准测试
An interactive sequential-decision benchmark from geosteering
论文作者
论文摘要
GeoSteering工作流程越来越多地基于实时操作中地下不确定性的量化。结果,运营决策既变得更加知情又更加复杂。本文提出了一种基于Web的决策支持系统,该系统可用于在不确定性下既有帮助专家决策,又可以进一步开发受控环境中的决策优化算法。系统的用户(人类或AI)控制着井的决策或停止钻孔。每当用户向前训练时,系统都会沿所选井轨迹产生模拟测量值,该测量方法用于更新使用集合Kalman滤波器通过模型实现表示的不确定性。为了实现知情决策,该系统配备了功能,以评估不确定性在当前实验目标的不确定性下的价值。 为了说明该系统作为基准的实用性,我们介绍了最初的实验,其中我们将地球科学家的决策技能与最近发表的自动决策支持算法的决策技能进行了比较。实验和调查表明,大多数参与者能够使用界面并完成三个测试回合。同时,自动化算法在29名合格的人类参与者中的表现优于28个。 这样的实验不足以得出有关实用的地理序列的结论,但对于地球科学来说仍然很有用。首先,这种进行沟通使76%的受访者对提出的技术更加好奇和/或自信。其次,该系统可以进一步用作不确定性下顺序决策的基准。这可以加速算法的发展并改善决策的培训。
Geosteering workflows are increasingly based on the quantification of subsurface uncertainties during real-time operations. As a consequence operational decision making is becoming both better informed and more complex. This paper presents an experimental web-based decision support system, which can be used to both aid expert decisions under uncertainty or further develop decision optimization algorithms in controlled environment. A user of the system (either human or AI) controls the decisions to steer the well or stop drilling. Whenever a user drills ahead, the system produces simulated measurements along the selected well trajectory which are used to update the uncertainty represented by model realizations using the ensemble Kalman filter. To enable informed decisions the system is equipped with functionality to evaluate the value of the selected trajectory under uncertainty with respect to the objectives of the current experiment. To illustrate the utility of the system as a benchmark, we present the initial experiment, in which we compare the decision skills of geoscientists with those of a recently published automatic decision support algorithm. The experiment and the survey after it showed that most participants were able to use the interface and complete the three test rounds. At the same time, the automated algorithm outperformed 28 out of 29 qualified human participants. Such an experiment is not sufficient to draw conclusions about practical geosteering, but is nevertheless useful for geoscience. First, this communication-by-doing made 76% of respondents more curious about and/or confident in the presented technologies. Second, the system can be further used as a benchmark for sequential decisions under uncertainty. This can accelerate development of algorithms and improve the training for decision making.