论文标题

重新访问$^{129} $ XE电动偶极矩测量,应用了新的全球相拟合方法

Revisiting $^{129}$Xe electric dipole moment measurements applying a new global phase fitting approach

论文作者

Liu, T., Rolfs, K., Fan, I., Haude, S., Kilian, W., Li, L., Schnabel, A., Voigt, J., Trahms, L.

论文摘要

通过测量两极分化$^{129} $ Xe和$^{3} $ He的核电磁旋转液频率,这是$^{129} $ XE原子电动偶极力矩(EDM)$ d_ \ d_ \ mathrm {a}(^a}(^a}(^129} {129} {129} \ Mathrm {xe xe in Phits Inty In In In In In In In In In In In In Incor)$^{129} $ XE $ XE原子电动偶矩(EDM)$ Xe amotiont Electric Moments(EDM)$^{129} $ Xe aTomic Electric Moment(EDM)$ XE的新上限。莱特牧师。 123,143003(2019)。在这里,我们提出了一种基于全局相位拟合(GPF)的新评估方法,用于分析$^{3} $ He-he-$^{129} $ xe comagnetometer信号的连续相位开发。 GPF方法的$^{129} $ XE EDM上的Cramer-Rao下限是理论上得出的,并显示了我们新方法的潜在好处。通过蒙特卡洛研究验证了GPF方法的鲁棒性。通过优化分析参数并添加无法用前面方法分析的数据,我们获得了$ d_ \ mathrm {a}的结果e〜 \ mathrm {cm} $在无盲分析中。对于系统的不确定性分析,我们从上述PRL出版物中采用了所有方法,除了comagnetometer阶段漂移,可以使用GPF方法省略。更新的空结果可以解释为$ |的新上限。 d_ \ mathrm {a}(^{129} \ mathrm {xe})| <8.3 \ times 10^{ - 28} 〜E〜 \ Mathrm {cm} $在95 \%c.l.

By measuring the nuclear magnetic spin precession frequencies of polarized $^{129}$Xe and $^{3}$He, a new upper limit on the $^{129}$Xe atomic electric dipole moment (EDM) $ d_\mathrm{A} (^{129}\mathrm{Xe})$ was reported in Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 143003 (2019). Here, we propose a new evaluation method based on global phase fitting (GPF) for analyzing the continuous phase development of the $^{3}$He-$^{129}$Xe comagnetometer signal. The Cramer-Rao Lower Bound on the $^{129}$Xe EDM for the GPF method is theoretically derived and shows the potential benefit of our new approach. The robustness of the GPF method is verified with Monte-Carlo studies. By optimizing the analysis parameters and adding data that could not be analyzed with the former method, we obtain a result of $d_\mathrm{A} (^{129}\mathrm{Xe}) = 1.1 \pm 3.6~\mathrm{(stat)} \pm 2.0~\mathrm{(syst)} \times 10^{-28}~ e~\mathrm{cm}$ in an unblinded analysis. For the systematic uncertainty analyses, we adopted all methods from the aforementioned PRL publication except the comagnetometer phase drift, which can be omitted using the GPF method. The updated null result can be interpreted as a new upper limit of $| d_\mathrm{A} (^{129}\mathrm{Xe}) | < 8.3 \times 10^{-28}~e~\mathrm{cm}$ at the 95\% C.L.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源