论文标题
IFC软件支持的参考研究：Geobim Benchmark 2019-第一部分
Reference study of IFC software support: the GeoBIM benchmark 2019 -- Part I
论文作者
论文摘要
IFC，建筑物的建筑信息模型的开放标准在其有希望的潜力方面不足，因为根据从业人员和与BIM合作的研究人员的经验，标准实施中的问题并使用了其有效使用。然而，从未对这些问题进行系统的调查，因此没有足够的证据来解决这些问题。 Geobim基准项目旨在通过涉及外部志愿者，报告有关相关方面的工具行为（几何，语义，地理学，地理发言，功能），以找到此类证据，并在本文中进行了描述。有趣的是，对于具有标准化数据的不同软件的行为，很少有模式可检测到，并且在支持标准方面发现了重大问题，这可能是由于标准数据模型的复杂性很高。本文与第二部分同时，描述了与CityGML有关的基准的结果，这是IFC的地理信息中的IFC。
IFC, buildingSMART open standard for Building Information Models, is underused with respect to its promising potential, since, according to the experience of practitioners and researchers working with BIM, issues in the standard's implementation and use prevent its effective use. Nevertheless, a systematic investigation of these issues has never been performed, and there is thus insufficient evidence for tackling the problems. The GeoBIM benchmark project is aimed at finding such evidence by involving external volunteers, reporting on tools behaviour about relevant aspects (geometry, semantics, georeferencing, functionalities), analysed and described in this paper. Interestingly, few patterns are detectable about the behaviour of different software with standardised data, and significant issues are found in their support of the standards, probably due to the very high complexity of the standard data model. This paper is in tandem with Part II, describing the results of the benchmark related to CityGML, counterpart of IFC within geoinformation.
