论文标题
电力分配能力受限的季节性氢存储决策
Seasonal hydrogen storage decisions under constrained electricity distribution capacity
论文作者
论文摘要
向可再生能源系统的过渡导致能源供应分散的分散化增加。太阳能公园旨在增加可再生能源渗透,并为越来越自给自足的当地社区提供。这些公园通常安装在电网分配能力有限的农村地区。这导致产生的能量产生网格充血。临时存储可以是解决方案。除了最适合在日内存储的电池外,氢还提供了长期的存储选择,可用于克服供应和需求的季节性不匹配。在本文中,我们研究了使用氢储存能源的运营决策,并考虑到网格容量限制,从或销售到网格。我们将问题作为马尔可夫决策过程建模,考虑到季节性生产和需求模式,不确定的太阳能产生以及当地的电价。我们表明,忽略季节性需求和生产模式是最佳的。此外,我们表明,在农村地区为太阳能农场引入氢存储设施可能会带来正利润,而这是没有存储设施的损失。在灵敏度分析中,我们表明,只有分布能力太小,氢的存储不会导致利润和电缆连接处的充血减少。当分配能力受到限制时,较高的存储容量会导致电网上与购买相关的动作,以防止未来的短缺并利用价格差异。这导致了连接电缆的更多拥堵,这是政策制定者和网络操作员的重要见解。
The transition to renewable energy systems causes increased decentralization of the energy supply. Solar parks are built to increase renewable energy penetration and to supply local communities that become increasingly self-sufficient. These parks are generally installed in rural areas where electricity grid distribution capacity is limited. This causes the produced energy to create grid congestion. Temporary storage can be a solution. In addition to batteries, which are most suitable for intraday storage, hydrogen provides a long-term storage option and can be used to overcome seasonal mismatches in supply and demand. In this paper, we examine the operational decisions related to storing energy using hydrogen, and buying from or selling to the grid considering grid capacity limitations. We model the problem as a Markov decision process taking into account seasonal production and demand patterns, uncertain solar energy generation, and local electricity prices. We show that ignoring seasonal demand and production patterns is suboptimal. In addition, we show that the introduction of a hydrogen storage facility for a solar farm in rural areas may lead to positive profits, whereas this is loss-making without storage facilities. In a sensitivity analysis, we show that only if distribution capacity is too small, hydrogen storage does not lead to profits and reduced congestion at the cable connection. When the distribution capacity is constrained, a higher storage capacity leads to more buying-related actions from the electricity grid to prevent future shortages and to exploit price differences. This leads to more congestion at the connected cable and is an important insight for policy-makers and net-operators.