论文标题
对使用神经网络,支持向量机和决策树的预测公司信用评级的比较研究
A comparative study of forecasting Corporate Credit Ratings using Neural Networks, Support Vector Machines, and Decision Trees
论文作者
论文摘要
信贷评级是反映公司履行其财务义务的风险和可靠性水平的主要密钥之一。评级机构倾向于延长时间来提供新的评级并更新较旧的评级。因此,近年来,使用人工智能的信用评分评估引起了很多兴趣。成功的机器学习方法可以在日常时间尺度上更新较旧的信用评分时快速分析。相关研究表明,神经网络和支持向量机通过提供更好的预测准确性优于其他技术。本文的目的是两倍。首先,我们对应用机器学习技术的文献的结果进行了调查和比较分析以预测信用评级。其次,我们将自己的四种机器学习技术应用于以前的研究(袋装决策树,随机森林,支持矢量机和多层求解)的有用,并将其用于同一数据集。我们使用10倍的交叉验证技术评估结果。所选数据集的实验结果显示了基于决策树的模型的卓越性能。除了对分类器的常规准确度度量之外,我们还基于称为“ Notch距离”的缺口来介绍一种精度度量,以分析上述分类器在特定的信用评级背景下的性能。该措施告诉我们预测与真实评分有多远。我们进一步比较了三个主要评级机构,标准$ \&$ poors,Moody's和Fitch的性能,在那里我们表明其评分的差异与决策树的预测与测试数据集中的实际评分相媲美。
Credit ratings are one of the primary keys that reflect the level of riskiness and reliability of corporations to meet their financial obligations. Rating agencies tend to take extended periods of time to provide new ratings and update older ones. Therefore, credit scoring assessments using artificial intelligence has gained a lot of interest in recent years. Successful machine learning methods can provide rapid analysis of credit scores while updating older ones on a daily time scale. Related studies have shown that neural networks and support vector machines outperform other techniques by providing better prediction accuracy. The purpose of this paper is two fold. First, we provide a survey and a comparative analysis of results from literature applying machine learning techniques to predict credit rating. Second, we apply ourselves four machine learning techniques deemed useful from previous studies (Bagged Decision Trees, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine and Multilayer Perceptron) to the same datasets. We evaluate the results using a 10-fold cross validation technique. The results of the experiment for the datasets chosen show superior performance for decision tree based models. In addition to the conventional accuracy measure of classifiers, we introduce a measure of accuracy based on notches called "Notch Distance" to analyze the performance of the above classifiers in the specific context of credit rating. This measure tells us how far the predictions are from the true ratings. We further compare the performance of three major rating agencies, Standard $\&$ Poors, Moody's and Fitch where we show that the difference in their ratings is comparable with the decision tree prediction versus the actual rating on the test dataset.