论文标题

提供不同价格的用户舒适和电力销售的最佳节能家庭能源管理

An Optimal Energy-Saving Home Energy Management Supporting User Comfort and Electricity Selling with Different Prices

论文作者

Dinh, Huy Truong, Kim, Daehee

论文摘要

在这项研究中,我们调查了具有综合可再生能源系统(RES)和储能系统(ESS)支持电力销售功能的最佳家庭能源管理系统(HEMS)的运行。提出了一个多目标混合整数非线性编程模型,包括Res,ESS,家用电器和主要网格,以优化不同且冲突的目标,即能源成本,用户舒适性和PAR。还详细考虑了不同销售价格对目标的影响。我们进一步为能源成本的下限开发了一个公式,以帮助居民或工程师在安装过程中快速为房屋选择Res的最佳参数和ESS的最佳参数。通过在三种不同的情况下,使用实际数据销售价格不同的三种不同情况下,通过广泛的模拟来验证我们的系统的性能,并根据每日能源成本,PAR,用户的便利性和使用电器的连续等待时间比较模拟结果。数值结果清楚地表明,与正常情况相比,经济方案的日常能源成本减少了51.6%,同时牺牲了用户的便利性,标准杆和连续的等待时间,分别增加了49%,132%和1小时。另一方面,智能场景仅显示出用户的便利性有轻微的降解和2%和18%,同时降低了每日能源成本46.4%,并且连续等待时间相同。此外,我们的模拟结果表明,即使每日能源成本增加,售价的降低也会对PAR和用户舒适性产生很小的影响。

In this study, we investigate the operation of an optimal home energy management system (HEMS) with integrated renewable energy system (RES) and energy storage system (ESS) supporting electricity selling functions. A multi-objective mixed integer nonlinear programming model, including RES, ESS, home appliances and the main grid, is proposed to optimize different and conflicting objectives which are energy cost, user comfort and PAR. The effect of different selling prices on the objectives is also considered in detail. We further develop a formula for the lower bound of energy cost to help residents or engineers quickly choose best parameters of RES and ESS for their homes during the installation process. The performance of our system is verified through extensive simulations under three different scenarios of normal, economic, and smart with different selling prices using real data, and simulation results are compared in terms of daily energy cost, PAR, user's convenience and consecutive waiting time to use appliances. Numerical results clearly show that the economic scenario achieves 51.6% reduction of daily energy cost compared to the normal scenario while sacrificing the user's convenience, PAR, and consecutive waiting time by 49%, 132%, and 1 hour, respectively. On the other hand, the smart scenario shows only slight degradation of user's convenience and PAR by 2% and 18%, respectively while achieving 46.4% reduction of daily energy cost and the same level of consecutive waiting time. Furthermore, our simulation results show that a decrease of selling prices has tiny impacts on PAR and user comfort even though the daily energy cost increases.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源