论文标题

超大的黑洞具有微弱的宽窄发射线

Hyper-massive Black Holes have Faint Broad and Narrow Emission Lines

论文作者

Bhat, Harshitha K., Chakravorty, Susmita, Sengupta, Dhrubojyoti, Elvis, Martin, Datta, Sudeb Ranjan, Roy, Nirupam, Bertemes, Caroline, Ferland, Gary, Ezhikode, Savithri H.

论文摘要

EUV提供了大部分电离,从而产生高等效宽度(EW)宽和狭窄的排放线(BELS,NELS)。超大型Schwarzschild黑洞的光谱(HMBHS,$ M_ {BH} \ GEQ 10^{10} M _ {\ odot} $)具有$α$ -DISCS,在EUV中迅速下降,表明EUV较低。质量$ 10^{6} -10^{12} m _ {\ odot} $的模型光谱$ 10^{6} -10^{\ odot} $ $ 0.03 \ leq l_ {bol}/l_ {bol}/l_ {edd} \ leq leq 1.0 $是对云的照相代码输入的。 bels从$ m_ {bh} \ sim 10^8 m _ {\ odot} $ to $ m_ {\ m_ {bh} \ sim 10^{10} m _ {\ odot} $弱从$ m_ {bh} \ sim 10^8 m _ {\ odot} $弱于$ \ sim $ 100倍。高电离bels(O VI 1034 $ \ Overset {\ Circ} {\ Mathrm {a}} $,C IV 1549 $ \ overset {\ circ} {\ mathrm {a}} $ ($ m_ {bh} \ geq 10^6 m _ {\ odot} $,重现baldwin效果,但以$ m_ {bh} \ geq 10^{10} {10} m _ {\ odot} $重新恢复EW。低电离线(MGII 2798 $ \ OUTSET {\ CRIC} {\ MATHRM {a}} $,H $β$ 4861 $ \ overset {\ circ} {\ Mathrm {a a}}} $ 虚弱的。最大旋转HMBH的线的行为也类似。 BELS的线比图表明,较高的OVI/H $β$和Low CIV/H $α$可能会挑选HMBH,尽管OVI通常很难观察到。在NEL BPT图中,HMBHS位于星形区域之间,除了高度旋转,高积聚率HMBHS。总之,使用当前的光学设施很难检测到HMBHS的BEL。从100到$ 10^{12} m _ {\ odot} $,用于检测AGN的发射线仅在$ 10^6-6-10^9 m _ {\ odot} $ window中,在其中找到了大多数AGN。这种选择效果可能会使报告的$ M_ {BH} $的分布变形。

The EUV provides most of the ionization that creates the high equivalent width (EW) broad and narrow emission lines (BELs, NELs) of quasars. Spectra of Hypermassive Schwarzschild black holes (HMBHs, $M_{BH} \geq 10^{10} M_{\odot}$) with $α$-discs, decline rapidly in the EUV suggesting much lower EWs. Model spectra for black holes of mass $10^{6}-10^{12} M_{\odot}$ and accretion rates $0.03 \leq L_{bol}/L_{edd} \leq 1.0$ were input to the CLOUDY photoionization code. BELs become $\sim$100 times weaker in EW from $M_{BH} \sim 10^8 M_{\odot}$ to $M_{BH} \sim 10^{10} M_{\odot}$. The high ionization BELs (O VI 1034 $\overset{\circ}{\mathrm {A}}$, C IV 1549 $\overset{\circ}{\mathrm {A}}$, He II 1640 $\overset{\circ}{\mathrm {A}}$) decline in EW from ($M_{BH} \geq 10^6 M_{\odot}$, reproducing the Baldwin effect, but regain EW for $M_{BH} \geq 10^{10} M_{\odot}$). The low ionization lines (MgII 2798 $\overset{\circ}{\mathrm {A}}$, H$β$ 4861 $\overset{\circ}{\mathrm {A}}$ and H$α$ 6563 $\overset{\circ}{\mathrm {A}}$) remain weak. Lines for maximally spinning HMBHs behave similarly. Line ratio diagrams for the BELs show that high OVI/H$β$ and low CIV/H$α$ may pick out HMBH, although OVI is often hard to observe. In NEL BPT diagrams HMBHs lie among star-forming regions, except for highly spinning, high accretion rate HMBHs. In summary, the BELs expected from HMBHs would be hard to detect using the current optical facilities. From 100 to $10^{12} M_{\odot}$, the emission lines used to detect AGN only have high EW in the $10^6 - 10^9 M_{\odot}$ window, where most AGN are found. This selection effect may be distorting reported distributions of $M_{BH}$.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源