论文标题
间歇性但协调的区域策略可以减轻Covid-19的流行病:意大利案件的网络模型
Intermittent yet coordinated regional strategies can alleviate the COVID-19 epidemic: a network model of the Italian case
论文作者
论文摘要
截至2019年底,武汉中国出现的COVID-19疫情特别艰难,实施了严格的国家锁定规则(第1阶段)。现在在意大利和国外正在进行一场持续的辩论,即最佳策略是重新启动一个国家退出国家锁定的国家(第2阶段)。先前的研究重点是建模可能在国家一级重新启动方案,忽视了这样一个事实,即意大利与世界其他国家一样,在行政区分裂,他们可以独立监督自己在意大利国家卫生服务局中的份额。在这项研究中,我们表明,区域主义和区域之间的异质性对于了解流行病的传播至关重要,更重要的是,设计有效的锁定后锁定策略来控制疾病。为了实现这一目标,我们将意大利建模为一个区域网络,并在最初爆发后将近两个月的实际数据上参数化每个区域的模型。使用该模型,我们确认意大利政府迄今为止实施的国家锁定战略区域级别的有效性,以减轻疾病的传播并显示其在区域一级的功效。我们还建议,尽管有协调的区域干预措施可以在第2阶段有效,以重新启动该国并避免流行病的未来复发,同时避免了区域卫生系统的饱和并减轻对成本的影响。我们的研究和方法可以很容易地扩展到其他层次的粒度(同一地区或其他联邦国家的省份或各州等),以支持政策和决策者。
The COVID-19 epidemic that emerged in Wuhan China at the end of 2019 hit Italy particularly hard, yielding the implementation of strict national lockdown rules (Phase 1). There is now a hot ongoing debate in Italy and abroad on what the best strategy is to restart a country to exit a national lockdown (Phase 2). Previous studies have focused on modelling possible restarting scenarios at the national level, overlooking the fact that Italy, as other nations around the world, is divided in administrative regions who can independently oversee their own share of the Italian National Health Service. In this study, we show that regionalism, and heterogeneity between regions, is essential to understand the spread of the epidemic and, more importantly, to design effective post Lock-Down strategies to control the disease. To achieve this, we model Italy as a network of regions and parameterize the model of each region on real data spanning almost two months from the initial outbreak. Using the model, we confirm the effectiveness at the regional level of the national lockdown strategy implemented so far by the Italian government to mitigate the spread of the disease and show its efficacy at the regional level. We also propose that differentiated, albeit coordinated, regional interventions can be effective in Phase 2 to restart the country and avoid future recurrence of the epidemic, while avoiding saturation of the regional health systems and mitigating impact on costs. Our study and methodology can be easily extended to other levels of granularity (provinces or counties in the same region or states in other federal countries, etc.) to support policy- and decision-makers.