论文标题
HTTP/2和HTTP/3之间的经验质量的早期基准使用灯塔
An Early Benchmark of Quality of Experience Between HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 using Lighthouse
论文作者
论文摘要
Google的Quic（GQUIC）是一种新兴的运输协议，旨在减少HTTP延迟。 GQUIC在其平台上部署并作为TCP+TLS的替代方案，功能丰富：提供可靠的数据传输和安全通信。它解决了TCP+TLS的（I）线路阻塞（HOLB），（ii）连接建立的过度往返时间，以及（iii）内部。 IETF的努力正在努力将下一代HTTP（HTTP/3或H3）的交付标准化，并具有自己的Quic变体。尽管GQUIC和HTTP/2-Over-TCP（H2）之间已经进行了性能基准，但据我们所知，H2和H3之间没有进行这种分析。此外，过去的研究依靠页面加载时间是其主要（即使不仅是公制）。这项工作的目的是基于H3的最新草案规范，并使用Lighthouse进一步研究用户的体验质量（QOE）：开源（和度量多样）的审计工具。我们的发现表明，对于H3的早期实施之一，H3大多更糟，但达到了更高的平均吞吐量
Google's QUIC (GQUIC) is an emerging transport protocol designed to reduce HTTP latency. Deployed across its platforms and positioned as an alternative to TCP+TLS, GQUIC is feature rich: offering reliable data transmission and secure communication. It addresses TCP+TLS's (i) Head of Line Blocking (HoLB), (ii) excessive round-trip times on connection establishment, and (iii) entrenchment. Efforts by the IETF are in progress to standardize the next generation of HTTP's (HTTP/3, or H3) delivery, with their own variant of QUIC. While performance benchmarks have been conducted between GQUIC and HTTP/2-over-TCP (H2), no such analysis to our knowledge has taken place between H2 and H3. In addition, past studies rely on Page Load Time as their main, if not only, metric. The purpose of this work is to benchmark the latest draft specification of H3 and dig further into a user's Quality of Experience (QoE) using Lighthouse: an open source (and metric diverse) auditing tool. Our findings show that, for one of H3's early implementations, H3 is mostly worse but achieves a higher average throughput
