论文标题
一般的双重稳定贝叶斯模型平均因果效应估计的方法,并应用于骨质疏松骨折的研究
A generalized double robust Bayesian model averaging approach to causal effect estimation with application to the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures
论文作者
论文摘要
分析师在选择协变量进行因果效应估计时通常使用数据驱动的方法来补充其实质知识。近年来已经设计了用于因果效应估计的多个可变选择程序,但是仍然需要进行其他发展以充分满足数据分析师的需求。在本文中,我们提出了广义的贝叶斯因果效应估计(GBCEE)算法,以执行可变选择,并对二进制或连续暴露和结果的因果效应产生双重稳健估计。 GBCEE采用了先前的分布,该分布针对真正的混杂因素和结果的预测因素,以降低标准误差的因果效应的无偏估计。双重稳健估计器可针对模型错误指定提供一些鲁棒性,而贝叶斯机械使GBCEE可以直接为其估计产生推断。将GBCEE与各种模拟场景中的多个替代方案进行了比较,并观察到表现类似或胜过双重鲁棒替代方案。从计算角度来看,它直接产生推断的能力也是一个重要的优势。最终说明了该方法以估算满足体育活动建议对骨质疏松性骨折研究中老年妇女中髋关节或上腿骨折风险的影响。 GBCEE产生的95%置信区间短于61%的置信区间,该置信区间比在此图中对所有潜在混杂因子进行调整的双重稳健估计器的置信区间短61%。
Analysts often use data-driven approaches to supplement their substantive knowledge when selecting covariates for causal effect estimation. Multiple variable selection procedures tailored for causal effect estimation have been devised in recent years, but additional developments are still required to adequately address the needs of data analysts. In this paper, we propose a Generalized Bayesian Causal Effect Estimation (GBCEE) algorithm to perform variable selection and produce double robust estimates of causal effects for binary or continuous exposures and outcomes. GBCEE employs a prior distribution that targets the selection of true confounders and predictors of the outcome for the unbiased estimation of causal effects with reduced standard errors. Double robust estimators provide some robustness against model misspecification, whereas the Bayesian machinery allows GBCEE to directly produce inferences for its estimate. GBCEE was compared to multiple alternatives in various simulation scenarios and was observed to perform similarly or to outperform double robust alternatives. Its ability to directly produce inferences is also an important advantage from a computational perspective. The method is finally illustrated for the estimation of the effect of meeting physical activity recommendations on the risk of hip or upper-leg fractures among elderly women in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. The 95% confidence interval produced by GBCEE is 61% shorter than that of a double robust estimator adjusting for all potential confounders in this illustration.