论文标题
激子和量子点二重奏之间的根本差异
Fundamental differences between exciton and quantum dot duo
论文作者
论文摘要
我们提出了五个主要原因，为什么半导体激子（即散装，量子井或量子线）的相关电子对与量子点中的一对概念上有所不同：（1）成对结合的起源，（2）与其他载体的相互作用，（2）与其他载体，（3）（3）对（4）Photor the Photor to Photor to Photor to Photor to Photor to Photor，（4）。由于这些差异，我们应该避免像通常这样做的那样将量子点中的电子孔对称为激子。我们建议将其称为二人组。在室内音乐的同一框架内，我们同样提议将三个和四个载体在一个点，三重奏和一个quatuor中命名，而不是Trion和Biexciton。
We present five major reasons why semiconductor exciton, that is, a correlated electron-hole pair in a bulk, quantum well, or quantum wire, is conceptually different from a pair in a quantum dot: (1) the origin of pair binding, (2) the interaction with additional carriers, (3) the quantum nature of the pair, (4) the coupling to photon, and (5) the photon-absorption mechanism. Due to these differences, we should refrain from calling an electron-hole pair in a quantum dot an exciton, as commonly done; we propose to call it a duo. Within the same frame of chamber musics, we likewise propose to call three and four carriers in a dot, a trio and a quatuor, instead of a trion and a biexciton.
