论文标题

对自动咳嗽检测的传感器相关性的客观研究

Objective Study of Sensor Relevance for Automatic Cough Detection

论文作者

Drugman, Thomas, Urbain, Jerome, Bauwens, Nathalie, Chessini, Ricardo, Valderrama, Carlos, Lebecque, Patrick, Dutoit, Thierry

论文摘要

多年医学文献强调了自动,客观和可靠发现咳嗽事件的系统的开发。这种工具的好处很明显,因为它可以评估慢性咳嗽疾病中的病理严重程度。即使某些方法最近报告了实现这项任务的解决方案,但仍然没有关于采用方法或使用传感器的标准化。本文的目的是客观地研究多个传感器以进行咳嗽检测:ECG,热敏电阻,胸部,加速度计,触点和音频麦克风。实验是在32个健康受试者的数据库中进行的,在约束室内以及在三种情况下,在各种体积上进行自愿咳嗽以及其他事件类别,可能会导致某些检测错误:背景噪音,强迫到期,到期,喉咙清除,言语和笑声。每个传感器的相关性在三个阶段进行评估:由特征传达的相互信息,在后来的其他歧义来源中以框架水平咳嗽区分的能力以及检测咳嗽事件的能力。在后一个实验中,平均灵敏度和约94.5%的特异性,所提出的方法已显示出明显优于商业karmelsonix系统,该系统的特异性为95.3%,灵敏度为64.9%。

The development of a system for the automatic, objective and reliable detection of cough events is a need underlined by the medical literature for years. The benefit of such a tool is clear as it would allow the assessment of pathology severity in chronic cough diseases. Even though some approaches have recently reported solutions achieving this task with a relative success, there is still no standardization about the method to adopt or the sensors to use. The goal of this paper is to study objectively the performance of several sensors for cough detection: ECG, thermistor, chest belt, accelerometer, contact and audio microphones. Experiments are carried out on a database of 32 healthy subjects producing, in a confined room and in three situations, voluntary cough at various volumes as well as other event categories which can possibly lead to some detection errors: background noise, forced expiration, throat clearing, speech and laugh. The relevance of each sensor is evaluated at three stages: mutual information conveyed by the features, ability to discriminate at the frame level cough from these latter other sources of ambiguity, and ability to detect cough events. In this latter experiment, with both an averaged sensitivity and specificity of about 94.5%, the proposed approach is shown to clearly outperform the commercial Karmelsonix system which achieved a specificity of 95.3% and a sensitivity of 64.9%.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源